{"status": "completed", "save": true, "saved": true, "memory_id": "mem_35031f7d2ae64415805676b6597362d2", "memory_ids": ["mem_35031f7d2ae64415805676b6597362d2", "mem_648aa9d0224b46fe85ebc08e41f75835", "mem_d5e70dce68174497a33371458d9c67b9", "mem_46bcc3518d504dc1ac0312c83390f8cb", "mem_92e6e50e73a546c39c04cfbb2c58c1d5"], "saved_count": 5, "raw": "{\"memories\":[{\"type\":\"project\",\"subtype\":\"system_behavior\",\"scope\":\"global\",\"title\":\"Memory service promotes all ingested items; inbox not used much\",\"content\":\"The agents-database memory service effectively auto-promotes incoming memories instead of relying on a separate inbox. This is a durable workflow fact for how memory ingestion currently behaves.\",\"source_ref\":\"session:019df92c-e0ad-77b9-8651-27b7657bd979\",\"evidence_ref\":\"branch:1602bef2 user message\",\"confidence\":0.84,\"freshness\":0.78,\"importance\":0.77,\"reason\":\"Directly stated in the session prompt and relevant to future memory workflow tuning.\"},{\"type\":\"episode\",\"subtype\":\"analysis\",\"scope\":\"global\",\"title\":\"Need to estimate memory yield from missed session-end hooks\",\"content\":\"User wanted to know whether recently broken session-end hooks would have produced many more memories, or only a modest increase, and to use that to decide whether ingestion should be broadened to capture lower-quality candidates for later promotion.\",\"source_ref\":\"session:019df92c-e0ad-77b9-8651-27b7657bd979\",\"evidence_ref\":\"branch:1602bef2 user message\",\"confidence\":0.81,\"freshness\":0.76,\"importance\":0.7,\"reason\":\"Useful summary of the core investigation goal and likely future follow-up.\"},{\"type\":\"project\",\"subtype\":\"blocker\",\"scope\":\"global\",\"title\":\"Memory validation blocked by OpenAI auth failure\",\"content\":\"The simulated memory pipeline connected, but real validation was blocked by `openai-codex` auth: token refresh 401, `refresh_token_reused`, and `No API key for provider: openai-codex`. Until auth is fixed, ingest validation cannot be trusted.\",\"source_ref\":\"session:019df92c-e0ad-77b9-8651-27b7657bd979\",\"evidence_ref\":\"last_assistant_text\",\"confidence\":0.97,\"freshness\":0.98,\"importance\":0.88,\"reason\":\"Strong blocker that affects continued work on the pipeline and future runs.\"},{\"type\":\"procedural\",\"subtype\":\"analysis_flow\",\"scope\":\"global\",\"title\":\"Memory analysis should inspect database counts by source_ref/date and job outcomes\",\"content\":\"The investigation plan was to query the shared memory SQLite DB, inspect table schema, then count memories by source reference and creation date, and correlate with session-memory job logs to estimate how many memories missed hooks might have produced.\",\"source_ref\":\"session:019df92c-e0ad-77b9-8651-27b7657bd979\",\"evidence_ref\":\"branch:6836e90c tool calls\",\"confidence\":0.72,\"freshness\":0.74,\"importance\":0.62,\"reason\":\"Reusable procedure for future memory-yield audits, though somewhat session-specific.\"},{\"type\":\"artifact\",\"subtype\":\"repo_path\",\"scope\":\"project\",\"title\":\"Session memory job artifacts live under pi-config session-memory-jobs\",\"content\":\"Job files for session-memory analysis are stored under `/home/sebas/pi-config/sessions/session-memory-jobs/`, including JSON and log artifacts for individual runs.\",\"source_ref\":\"session:019df92c-e0ad-77b9-8651-27b7657bd979\",\"evidence_ref\":\"branch:2c171437 tool calls\",\"confidence\":0.91,\"freshness\":0.73,\"importance\":0.54,\"reason\":\"Useful path reference for later investigation and debugging.\"}],\"reason\":\"Session centered on memory ingestion yield, auto-promotion behavior, and a hard auth blocker in the validation path. Kept the high-signal workflow fact, the blocker, and a couple of reusable analysis artifacts/procedures.\"}", "result": {"memories": [{"type": "project", "subtype": "system_behavior", "scope": "global", "title": "Memory service promotes all ingested items; inbox not used much", "content": "The agents-database memory service effectively auto-promotes incoming memories instead of relying on a separate inbox. This is a durable workflow fact for how memory ingestion currently behaves.", "source_ref": "session:019df92c-e0ad-77b9-8651-27b7657bd979", "evidence_ref": "branch:1602bef2 user message", "confidence": 0.84, "freshness": 0.78, "importance": 0.77, "reason": "Directly stated in the session prompt and relevant to future memory workflow tuning."}, {"type": "episode", "subtype": "analysis", "scope": "global", "title": "Need to estimate memory yield from missed session-end hooks", "content": "User wanted to know whether recently broken session-end hooks would have produced many more memories, or only a modest increase, and to use that to decide whether ingestion should be broadened to capture lower-quality candidates for later promotion.", "source_ref": "session:019df92c-e0ad-77b9-8651-27b7657bd979", "evidence_ref": "branch:1602bef2 user message", "confidence": 0.81, "freshness": 0.76, "importance": 0.7, "reason": "Useful summary of the core investigation goal and likely future follow-up."}, {"type": "project", "subtype": "blocker", "scope": "global", "title": "Memory validation blocked by OpenAI auth failure", "content": "The simulated memory pipeline connected, but real validation was blocked by `openai-codex` auth: token refresh 401, `refresh_token_reused`, and `No API key for provider: openai-codex`. Until auth is fixed, ingest validation cannot be trusted.", "source_ref": "session:019df92c-e0ad-77b9-8651-27b7657bd979", "evidence_ref": "last_assistant_text", "confidence": 0.97, "freshness": 0.98, "importance": 0.88, "reason": "Strong blocker that affects continued work on the pipeline and future runs."}, {"type": "procedural", "subtype": "analysis_flow", "scope": "global", "title": "Memory analysis should inspect database counts by source_ref/date and job outcomes", "content": "The investigation plan was to query the shared memory SQLite DB, inspect table schema, then count memories by source reference and creation date, and correlate with session-memory job logs to estimate how many memories missed hooks might have produced.", "source_ref": "session:019df92c-e0ad-77b9-8651-27b7657bd979", "evidence_ref": "branch:6836e90c tool calls", "confidence": 0.72, "freshness": 0.74, "importance": 0.62, "reason": "Reusable procedure for future memory-yield audits, though somewhat session-specific."}, {"type": "artifact", "subtype": "repo_path", "scope": "project", "title": "Session memory job artifacts live under pi-config session-memory-jobs", "content": "Job files for session-memory analysis are stored under `/home/sebas/pi-config/sessions/session-memory-jobs/`, including JSON and log artifacts for individual runs.", "source_ref": "session:019df92c-e0ad-77b9-8651-27b7657bd979", "evidence_ref": "branch:2c171437 tool calls", "confidence": 0.91, "freshness": 0.73, "importance": 0.54, "reason": "Useful path reference for later investigation and debugging."}], "reason": "Session centered on memory ingestion yield, auto-promotion behavior, and a hard auth blocker in the validation path. Kept the high-signal workflow fact, the blocker, and a couple of reusable analysis artifacts/procedures."}}